Re: [wmii] Re: dtach v. screen

On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 14:38 +0200, Uriel wrote:

> See tee(1)
>
> uriel

Yes, I sometimes use that, but frankly screen is more useful to me. I'll
stick with that unless someone can tell me how to get the dtach redraw
working better. Or maybe I'll look at the code myself...
-RPM

>
> On 6/2/06, Ross Mohn <rpmohn_AT_waxandwane.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:51 -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> >
> > > Might I suggest, though, that you use dtach (http://dtach.sf.net/) instead
> > of
> > > bloaty screen. It doesn't have any features except for detatching from
> > > terminals and even lets you attach to a process more than once. (Thanks to
> > > sjmorgan for posting this to #wmii)
> >
> >
> >
> > I really only use screen for detaching. I would prefer to use dtach, but
> > when I reconnect, for example, to a shell that is running a compilation,
> > I can't see what the previous output was. I've tried all three redraw
> > methods, but whenever I reattach to a running shell, the cursor always
> > starts at the top and doesn't show the previous output. This doesn't
> > work for me when I'm compiling because I don't get the output to tell me
> > what happened! Anyone know how to make dtach redraw work the same way it
> > does when I reattach using screen?
> >
> > Thanks -RPM
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> wmii_AT_wmii.de mailing list
> http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
>
Received on Fri Jun 02 2006 - 20:30:23 UTC