Re: Bar going away? (was: Re: [wmii] Re: wmii-4 fs proposal/discussion)

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:10:35AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:55:16AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:45:27AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:30:49AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
>> >>The change that uriel is talking about is making the bar one text string
>> >>that's split left/right at the first | with words prefixed with # being
>> >>view names and ones prefixed with * also being selected. He also wants to
>> >>be able to edit the time to change it. Don't try to argue with *me* over
>> >>this, it's uriel's argument not mine.
>> >
>> >This proposal will make it necessary to write the complete bar
>> >content on every update. I'm not sure I like it. But the idea of
>> >creating labels separated by | doesn't looks to bad.
>> Yes, I'm not at all happy with that aspect of the situation. Nor the
>> inability to set indevidual bar colors (uriel just kicked me, for
>> reference), but I do like the idea of being able to, for instance, just
>> type in a new bar name and plumb it.
>
>There is a difference in how Uriel would like to see the bar and
>me. The bar I have in mind consists of a left bar which is
>editable and takes the rest width of the uneditable right bar,
>which can be used for status info and stuff like done atm.
>Switching views is done through plumbing, the selected view
>might be highlighted with *foo*.
Yes, I like this just fine.

>> WAP is crap.
>
>Web is crap.
Tell that to whomever wrote the plan 9 fortune file. I took it to mean the
broken wireless encryption protocol. I use OpenVPN since I happen to agree.

-- 
Kris Maglione
Trucks must enter weigh station when flashing.