Re: [wmii] wmii-3.1 bug (fix): libixp overload

From: Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:07:35 +0200

On 9/20/06, Sean Russell <wmii_AT_ser1.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:45, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> > 2. Use a _bus_ communication channel, which is separate from the
> > usual IXP stuff, for broadcasting events. This way, anyone
> > interested in events can simply connect to this bus and get events
> > at their leisure, without any data loss (the bus listener would be
> > buffered I/O, like a socket, so you do not miss any events).
>
> Boy, I'll bet that I get tarred and feathered for suggesting this... but
> what about dbus? The only significant disadvantage I can see is the
> external dependency it would introduce, which is probably enough to
> keep it from being an option.

Please, jump into a barrel full of sulfuric acid. Thank you.

*end of discussion*

uriel
Received on Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:07:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:14:22 UTC