On Friday 13 October 2006 20:54, Jeffrey Lim wrote:
> Consider the old wmii-2 way of handling the float layout in terms of
> z-stacking - it was very intuitive, and quite plain and simple. What u
> expected (intuitively) was what u really got. If u had window 1 at the
> top of the z-stack, and then subsequently brought window 2 up to the
> top (by cycling to it), window 3 and 4 did not also pop up to the top
> too for no apparent reason to obscure window 1. The natural user will
> naturally start to think... "what the .... for????"
+1
I didn't come to WMII until v3, so I wasn't aware that it ever behaved
differently... but I agree that this is WMII's most aggrivating behavior at
the moment.
-- ### SER ### Deutsch|Esperanto|Francaise|Linux|XML|Java|Ruby|Aikido|Iaido ### http://www.ser1.net jabber.com:ser ICQ:83578737 ### GPG: http://www.ser1.net/Security/ser_public.gpgReceived on Sat Oct 14 2006 - 14:51:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:15:41 UTC