On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:42:50PM +0100, Denis Grelich wrote:
> I don't like this idea. The 9P interface is very easy to use and keeps
> interaction pretty straightforward. I doubt the difference would be
> gigantic (there definitely would be one, though), since you still have
> all the brakes of the shell -- standalone processes for every string
> manipulation and maybe calculation. It could be even worse: if you have
> only one channel to communicate, you have to do much more serious
> parsing. What you would lose on the other hand is quite some
> flexibility. I think paying the price of 9P is alright. It might be
> something different on old and slow machines, but I don't want to think
> of wmii as a »poor man's« window manager. Anyway, these are thoughts
> for wmii-4 already.
Fine with me, it was just an idea.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Thu Nov 09 2006 - 14:21:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:16:41 UTC