Re: [wmii] Re: quick thanks... for wmii

From: Uriel <>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:56:51 +0100

Yay, advice from one of the guys that brought us svn, the worst
disaster of the history of open source software, and it didn't match
closed software disasters because they didn't have enough money to
fuck things so much.

But lets try just for fun: of all the people that have posted to this
thread, who has contributed to wmii and what have they contributed?

I say wmii is shit, because even if I will be ashamed of it all my
life(and good part of my afterlife), wmii is for the most part my
brainchild. And if you think wmii is great, then you got no fucking
clue about what decent software is.

The sad thing is that compared with all the crap that floods the
(l)unix world this days, wmii is better than most other software, but
that only tells you how bad (l)unix has become.

To end all this pointless noise I suggest to all the ignorant fools
that have no clue about software design, are ignorant of the unix
history, and could not tell sane software from a gnu turd even if
their life depended on it: to either start to get a clue and get over
the fact that all the software they use is shit, or to fuck off and
stop spamming.

But there will be no progress if you don't start by getting over the
fact that that all the software you use is *CRAP*.


On 1/19/07, <> wrote:
> > Twas brillig at 14:12:48 when Timo Benk did gyre and gimble:
> >
> > TB> But, who cares something that offtopic?
> >
> > 'Noisy minority' effect in action [1]. Just ignore Uriel, it's safe.
> >
> > [1]
> I will read
> proactively :)
> --
> Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
> Ideal für Modem und ISDN:
Received on Fri Jan 19 2007 - 21:56:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:19:27 UTC