Re: [wmii] floating area no longer represented by ~

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:54:46AM -0800, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
>Also, would you consider accepting index 0 as the
>floating area? It would be nice to be consistent with
>the column numbering scheme: the first column has
>index 1, second has index 2, and so on.

No. That's the way it used to be, and it was confusing,
especially to those of us used to zero-indexed arrays. The
floating area is not a column.

-- 
Kris Maglione
If you plan to leave your mark in the sands of time,
you better wear work shoes.
PGP: http://suckless.org/~jg/pubkey.pgp
SHA1 (pubkey.pgp) = 2d464f9dbb186bee6f4faa88e2f6c5802bcfd935