Re: [wmii] floating area no longer represented by ~

From: Suraj N. Kurapati <snk_AT_gna.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)

Kris Maglione wrote:
> The floating area is not a column.

True, but it is an area nevertheless. And since
columns (managed areas) are also areas, I would argue
that it makes sense to number them as 0: floating,
1..n: managed.
Received on Wed Jan 30 2008 - 22:37:25 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kris Maglione: "Re: [wmii] floating area no longer represented by ~"
Previous message: Kris Maglione: "Re: [wmii] floating area no longer represented by ~"
In reply to: Kris Maglione: "Re: [wmii] floating area no longer represented by ~"
Next in thread: Kris Maglione: "Re: [wmii] floating area no longer represented by ~"
Reply: Kris Maglione: "Re: [wmii] floating area no longer represented by ~"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:35:33 UTC