Re: [wmii] wmii on wikipedia

From: Uriel <>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:17:25 +0200

Well, the current wiki and the new dweb (or whatever) do not support
virtual hosts (forcing things to live on random subdirs of, which is another thing that sucks about both setups
(apparently arg hasn't figured out yet how to use virtual hosts

I'm fine with being the 'canonical' address, but
given that control over DNS records at suckless has historically
sucked badly (afaik still has no dns 'real' servers under
our control, although having gandi manage it is quite a bit more
reassuring than whatever crap we had before), and after got
lost I'm somewhat reticent to depend on a domain owned by garbeam I'm
somewhat skeptic, and I'm not happy hosting stuff without having
direct control over its dns records, it is asking for trouble next
time arg changes his mind.



On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Kris Maglione <> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>> Well I'd like to know if this move is really gonna happen,
>> because in my opinion is only a temporary
>> fallback. But I might be wrong here. I always planned to have
>> wmii at the new which is currently under
>> development and will be launched this weekend.
> I've changed it to in the recent past. As far as I'm
> concerned, that's the official website. Sorry, I don't have time to read the
> rest of this thread at present. I'll read anything in this subthread.
> --
> Kris Maglione
> Beware of "the real world". A speaker's apeal to it is always an
> invitation not to challenge his tacit assumptions.
> --Edsger W. Dijkstra
Received on Fri Jul 11 2008 - 01:17:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:45:24 UTC