Re: [wmii] libixp/fs.c: wstat?

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Robert C Corsaro <rcorsaro_AT_optaros.com> wrote:
> So if the command is `mount -t 9p ...` then what is wrong with referring to
> it as 9pfs ? perhaps there is a problem with the way '9p' is used in the
> linux impl.
>
> Uriel wrote:
>>
>> Uhu? I think you are confused, see http://9p.cat-v.org/implementations and
>> /faq
>>
>> 9P2000 is the latest version of the protocol, used by pretty much
>> everyone using 9P.
>>
>> The linux kernel implementation is called v9fs.
>>
>> uriel
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Robert C Corsaro <rcorsaro_AT_optaros.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Uriel wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Michael Stapelberg
>>>> <michael_AT_stapelberg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Kris,
>>>>>
>>>>> * [30.01.09 03:46]:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're right, libixp should certainly not try to call methods that
>>>>>> aren't
>>>>>> implemented. But, you haven't attached a patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry, it's getting late ;-). Find the patch attached now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3) When writing "Fullscreen toggle" to /client/sel/ctl, something
>>>>>>> (probably
>>>>>>> 9pfs) produces a hard-lockup (sound freezes, X11 freezes, nothing
>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>> no more, just reboot). This may be related to 2). I'm not sure how
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> further debug this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know how wmii could cause this. It could certainly freeze X11,
>>>>>> and so probably any badly written audio player (e.g., xmms), but
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using cmus, which does not seem to be written so badly ;-).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> certainly not lock up your computer. Can you ssh in? Are you using
>>>>>> 9pfs?
>>>>>> That *could* certainly lock up your computer, but it shouldn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> SSHing in is not possible. Yes, I'm using 9pfs. I think it could be
>>>>> wstat
>>>>> not
>>>>> being implemented or something like this causing an endless loop in
>>>>> 9pfs
>>>>> or similar?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is 9pfs? You mean v9fs? If so, *sigh*
>>>>
>>>> uriel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The linux impl is called 9p2000 and type is 9p when mounting :P
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

It's just about terminology. don't call it 9pfs.
Received on Fri Feb 06 2009 - 16:13:39 UTC