Re: [wmii] libixp/fs.c: wstat?

From: Robert C Corsaro <rcorsaro_AT_optaros.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:56:03 -0500

So if the command is `mount -t 9p ...` then what is wrong with
referring to it as 9pfs ? perhaps there is a problem with the way '9p'
is used in the linux impl.

Uriel wrote:
> Uhu? I think you are confused, see http://9p.cat-v.org/implementations and /faq
>
> 9P2000 is the latest version of the protocol, used by pretty much
> everyone using 9P.
>
> The linux kernel implementation is called v9fs.
>
> uriel
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Robert C Corsaro <rcorsaro_AT_optaros.com> wrote:
>
>> Uriel wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Michael Stapelberg
>>> <michael_AT_stapelberg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Kris,
>>>>
>>>> * [30.01.09 03:46]:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You're right, libixp should certainly not try to call methods that
>>>>> aren't
>>>>> implemented. But, you haven't attached a patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, it's getting late ;-). Find the patch attached now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> 3) When writing "Fullscreen toggle" to /client/sel/ctl, something
>>>>>> (probably
>>>>>> 9pfs) produces a hard-lockup (sound freezes, X11 freezes, nothing
>>>>>> possible
>>>>>> no more, just reboot). This may be related to 2). I'm not sure how to
>>>>>> further debug this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know how wmii could cause this. It could certainly freeze X11,
>>>>> and so probably any badly written audio player (e.g., xmms), but
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'm using cmus, which does not seem to be written so badly ;-).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> certainly not lock up your computer. Can you ssh in? Are you using 9pfs?
>>>>> That *could* certainly lock up your computer, but it shouldn't.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> SSHing in is not possible. Yes, I'm using 9pfs. I think it could be wstat
>>>> not
>>>> being implemented or something like this causing an endless loop in 9pfs
>>>> or similar?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What is 9pfs? You mean v9fs? If so, *sigh*
>>>
>>> uriel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The linux impl is called 9p2000 and type is 9p when mounting :P
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 06 2009 - 15:56:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 06 2009 - 16:00:09 UTC