Big surprise, the v9fs maintainers are following the Plan 9 tradition
and trying to confuse everyone as much as possible.
uriel
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:13:39PM +0100, hiro wrote:
>>
>> It's just about terminology. don't call it 9pfs.
>
> http://www.gweep.ca/~edmonds/usenet/ml-etiquette.html#SECTION00090000000000000000
>
> But, on a more related note, its name isn't immediately, or even distantly
> obvious. The module's name is (now) 9p.ko, and it has no man page, or
> installed documentation whatever, for that matter. The only way to see that
> it's called v9fs is to look at your dmesg.
>
> P.S. There's a difference between 'terminology' and 'nomenclature'.
>
> --
> Kris Maglione
>
> Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
> --Edsger W. Dijkstra
>
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 06 2009 - 18:18:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 06 2009 - 18:24:06 UTC