Hi,
2009/5/6 Robert C Corsaro <rcorsaro_AT_optaros.com>:
[SNIP]
> KIMURA,
>
> Sounds good. I'll probably change a few things while I'm at it. Any reason
> you use $package-hg instead of $package-9999? I'm just wondering as I've
> always used 9999 to indicate tip in my ebuilds.
There is no technical reason why I use $package-hg instead of
$package. I'd just label what scm tool is used by the upstream.
The reason why I don't use 9999 as ebuild version number is to note hg
revision when I updated for myself.
And IIRC, the file, DISTRIBUTORS said something like "package should
tag hg revision as packaged wmii's version number."
[SNIP]
Received on Wed May 06 2009 - 02:19:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 06 2009 - 02:24:07 UTC