On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> I've lately used iostat,
Thanks, I'll look into it.
>> To be honest, getting CPU 'usage' is pretty pointless as it's either busy,
>> idle or busy waiting on IO. You should be using loadavg really as
>> instantaneous CPU usage tells you nothing.
I already show load averages in the status bar, but I find CPU usage
interesting information anyway.
Also thanks, Manuel, for the suggestion of the -b option for top,
although as Kris pointed
out, top might be a bit slow for a status script.
Jesus.
Received on Wed May 06 2009 - 07:40:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 06 2009 - 08:00:07 UTC