[dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

From: Matthew Bauer <mjbauer95_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:49:48 -0500

Would Mercurial be considered suckless?

I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.

Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?
Received on Wed Jun 09 2010 - 22:49:48 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kris Maglione: "Re: [dev] Re: [ANN] wmii 3.9.1 released"
Previous message: Gene Auyeung: "[dev] [surf] Segfault bug"
Next in thread: Antoni Grzymala: "Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?"
Reply: Antoni Grzymala: "Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?"
Reply: Kris Maglione: "Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?"
Reply: Matthew Bauer: "[dev] Re: Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?"
Reply: Michael P. Soulier: "Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 09 2010 - 23:00:04 UTC