Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

From: Michael P. Soulier <>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:51:02 -0400

On 09/06/10 Matthew Bauer said:

> Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
> I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
> standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.
> Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?

more simpler? :)

Git and Hg are very similar. IMHO it makes little difference which one you


Michael P. Soulier <>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
--Albert Einstein

Received on Thu Jun 10 2010 - 12:51:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 10 2010 - 13:12:02 UTC