Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: Martin Kopta <martin_AT_kopta.eu>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:01:45 +0100

Are there any explicit rules which project must follow in order to be
part of suckless? What is the line in here?

thanks, mkopta

On 10/31/2011 09:38 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 30 October 2011 22:51, Jeremy Jackins<jeremyjackins_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> First I want many projects removed from suckless.org, only the real key
>>> projects should survive. I plan to set up suckmore-graveyard.org or something
>>> similar in a couple of weeks to allow for an archive of those non fitters, as
>>
>> Aside from wmii, what other projects do you have in mind? I'm suddenly
>> nervous that my favorite software is going to start to disappear...
>
> The current list of definite removal candidates is:
>
> * wmi (the historical bit of it would be on the graveyard as well)
> * wmii
> * libixp
> * wmiirc-ruby
> * skvm (who uses this? development seems dead)
> * vp (what is this?)
>
> The current list of unclear removal candidates is:
>
> * surf (seems dead, please shout if you disagree or if anyone wants to
> take this on, it doesn't make sense if it is not maintained, as
> webkitgtk carries away)
> * ii (Nion, are you still maintaining it?)
>
> Hope this clarifies it a bit. Sharpening the suckless.org philosophy
> will lead to one tool for each task, not many.
>
> Cheers,
> Anselm
>
Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 10:01:45 CET