> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 06:07:38PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>Hey,
>
>On 10/11/2011, Roger <rogerx.oss_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Seems DWM takes precedence over the mplayer's options concerning monitor
>> placement. So using the dwm.h file is best for specifying monitor?
>
>dwm does take precedence, yes, since it tiles the window instead of
>letting it float. Out of interest, could you post the xprop(1) output
>for the newly-mapped mplayer window?
I'm using dwm-5.9. I'd love to get a dwm-9999.ebuild into Gentoo, but some
hate cvs/svn/git ebuilds and I have a tough time getting them into Gentoo.
$ xprop
WM_STATE(WM_STATE):
window state: Normal
icon window: 0x0
WM_NORMAL_HINTS(WM_SIZE_HINTS):
program specified location: 1681, 262
program specified size: 704 by 528
program specified minimum size: 4 by 4
program specified minimum aspect ratio: 704/528
program specified maximum aspect ratio: 704/528
program specified base size: 0 by 0
window gravity: Static
WM_ICON_NAME(STRING) = "MPlayer"
WM_NAME(STRING) = "MPlayer"
_NET_WM_PID(CARDINAL) = 13308
WM_CLASS(STRING) = "xv", "MPlayer"
WM_PROTOCOLS(ATOM): protocols WM_DELETE_WINDOW
This instance of mplayer is on the second monitor and not fullscreen.
--
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
Received on Fri Nov 11 2011 - 02:33:23 CET