Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

From: FRIGN <>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:11:34 +0200

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:02:01 +0200
Anders Eurenius <> wrote:

> Also, don't confuse low LOC count with simplicity. Splitting the main loop
> has merit even without either fastblink or blink.

I'll take a closer look at what you did with the main loop and let you
know what I think.
In most cases, however, simplicity comes with shortness.

> INVISIBLE has real and useful use in kpcli, where passwords are written
> out invisible, which means you can copy+paste without either
> (a) mucking with x selection. (nice over ssh) or
> (b) showing your password to shoulder surfers
> STRUCK or CROSSED-OUT (as Dickey notes it's called in ISO-6429)
> is right because you might want it to actually mark deletions.
> It's also a legit, non-insane code from a standard, so if it doesn't add
> too much, it should be included.

Thanks for clearing this up!



Received on Mon Jun 23 2014 - 16:11:34 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jun 23 2014 - 16:12:10 CEST