On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:03:28 +0200
Sylvain BERTRAND <sylware_AT_legeek.net> wrote:
> This is where we disagree. You draw the line there: acceptance of
> the technical cost of make in your SDKs whatever the size.
> I guess, I draw the line somewhere else, damned!
Says the guy who puts
#This is a brutal makefile... but extremely easy to read as it is actually
#very basic makefile logic.
on top of a 450 LOC makefile[0]. Dr. Frankenstein would be impressed!
> Install windows and visual studio then. Subscribe to msdn. That
> argument is invalid. Don't accept "common" practice blindly like
> a "fanatic" :).
I'm talking about common practice in the scope of suckless software
development, not in the sense of software development in general.
If you really believed in GNU/Freedom(R), you would never even talk
about Microsoft. You've been unmasked!
> Then, you'll think I'm stupid, and I'll think you are stupid.
> Welcome in the human world.
With the difference that I'm not the only one here who thinks your
makefile-concept is stupid.
> Oh! "writing portable makefile" did pop up. Could you explain
> me why it relates to this topic?
Yes, because your points aren't.
Cheers
FRIGN
[0]:
https://github.com/sylware/mudev/blob/master/makefile
--
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Wed Jun 25 2014 - 17:16:34 CEST