Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well executing swerc for each request is still overhead. But for the sake of
> not doing weirdo stuff (like hiding .html or redirecting from previously known
> URL to some .html file) in order to keep all the links to suckless.org intact,
> I'm not inclined to disable the swerc approach atm.
Heyho Anselm,
Most static site generators I've seen just use the approach, that every folder
has a index.html, so that
http://st.suckless.org/patches/ dispalys the
st.suckless.org/patches/index.html file. I'm not that much into web stuff to
know if that is called „.html hiding“ or what the disadvantages would be.
However I know that it would allow for keeping all current links intact.
--Markus
Received on Tue Feb 03 2015 - 10:07:47 CET