Re: [dev] A suckless issue tracker

From: Mattias Andrée <maandree_AT_kth.se>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 00:54:09 +0200

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 23:08:18 +0200
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:58:49 +0200
> Mattias Andrée <maandree_AT_member.fsf.org> wrote:
>
> Hey Mattias,
>
> > Well it was on the list of software you needed,
> > so I thought I could help out. (So no, it is not
> > a NIH-timewaster.)
> >
> > I have not spent too much time researching the
> > area. (But I assumed you had.) The best solution
> > to the problem that I know if is bugseverywhere,
> > but I think it is poorly designed and last time
> > I used it, it was very buggy. I guess one could
> > build a solution around it but I think that would
> > be a half-assed solution.
> >
> > The entry in 'project ideas' as not very
> > descriptive of what is needed, but I thought
> > that addressed later.
>
> Please don't CC the mail to me directly, the ml
> doesn't work like this here. ;)
>
> _AT_topic: The software list is hopelessly outdated
> in many parts (I just removed a request to port
> stuff to bionic libc, which was an obvious DoA a
> few months ago).
>
> Please again tell me what it does better than
> bugseverywhere than only being less bug-ridden.

Here is a list of what I think should be implemented.
<https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maandree/sit/master/doc/goals>

>
> Cheers
>
> FRIGN
>


Received on Tue Apr 07 2015 - 00:54:09 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Apr 07 2015 - 01:00:09 CEST