Re: [dev] quirks with sam's structured regexps

From: Greg Reagle <greg.reagle_AT_umbc.edu>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:43:17 -0500

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:59:41AM +0000, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> On 28 February 2016 at 17:20, Greg Reagle <greg.reagle_AT_umbc.edu> wrote:
> > I get these results: The first version works fine. The second version
> > shows error "?changes not in sequence" and does nothing.
>
> There is a difference between acme's handling. It prints a warning but
> also does some changes which are mangled.

That's interesting. It's funny that sam does a better job since acme is a
successor to sam. I wonder if/how they share code.
Received on Tue Mar 01 2016 - 13:43:17 CET