Re: [dwm] Documentation!

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:39:07PM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
> That's what I still think too. Fortunally DEFGEOM is gone in dwm-tip.
>
> Nevertheless there is a trend in dwm to "overoptimise" the code. I
> think dwm-4.7 was the simplest. That's why my branch is still based on
> 4.7.

I agree and that's the reason why I want dwm-5.0 as clean
release again in this regard, or in other words as the
simpliest, cleanest and best release so far.

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361