On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
> NCURSES?! LIBCACA?! You're absolutely insane!
> Only because it's terminal based makes the libraries not better.
>
> GTK is the least sucking way (anyway not a good one) to use Webkit. If
> you want to use a textbrowser use elinks.
>
> I think uzbl is a good base to write a better browser, but I believe
> gtk can't be removed without touching webkit itself.
>
> regards
> Gottox
I agree with you Enno, I think that uzbl can became a very interesting
browser because it's trying to follow the Unix way and at the same time
its rendering, thanks to Webkit, isn't bad.
About options I think too that using getopt(3) style options is simpler,
at least for the user but at this state of the development it's just a
small detail (and probably writing a patch to fix this behaviour isn't
very hard).
I should try uzbl soon, thanks for this web browser and keep up the good
work!
Ciao, Leonardo
-- Leonardo Taccari | Peace, love and NetBSD. | http://leot.altervista.org/Received on Sun May 24 2009 - 16:11:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 24 2009 - 16:12:01 UTC