Re: [dev] Suckless (*NIX|*BSD) Distribution?

Because it is not bloated with httpd and perl in the _basesystem_ ? :-)

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Leandro Chescotta <
leandro.chescotta_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> Why freebsd is not suckless? not arguing, but i don't know a lot about
> BSD's, so, i wanna know
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Fernan Bolando<fernanbolando_AT_mailc.net>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Uriel<lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Agreed, OpenBSD is far from perfect, but it sucks much less than any
> >> other *nix system out there this days.
> >>
> >> Peace
> >>
> >> uriel
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Jack Woehr<jax_AT_well.com> wrote:
> >>> There's already a BSD distrib that sucks less. It's called OpenBSD!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jack J. Woehr # I run for public office from time to time.
> It's
> >>> like
> >>> http://www.well.com/~jax <http://www.well.com/%7Ejax> # working out at
> the gym, you sweat a lot, don't
> >>> get
> >>> http://www.softwoehr.com # anywhere, and you fall asleep easily
> afterwards.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > crux distro for linux
> > openbsd or netbsd for bsd
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.fernski.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------
> http://aleyscha.spaces.live.com/
>
> ""El lugar mas peligroso de todos es el cielo... En el, cada
> pensamiento se hace realidad... sea bueno o malo... creas tu paraiso o
> tu infierno""
>
>
Received on Sun Jun 21 2009 - 12:20:24 UTC