Re: [dev] Suckless (*NIX|*BSD) Distribution?

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Leandro
Chescotta<leandro.chescotta_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Why freebsd is not suckless? not arguing, but i don't know a lot about
> BSD's, so, i wanna know
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Fernan Bolando<fernanbolando_AT_mailc.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Uriel<lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Agreed, OpenBSD is far from perfect, but it sucks much less than any
>>> other *nix system out there this days.
>>>
>>> Peace
>>>
>>> uriel
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Jack Woehr<jax_AT_well.com> wrote:
>>>> There's already a BSD distrib that sucks less. It's called OpenBSD!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jack J. Woehr            # I run for public office from time to time. It's
>>>> like
>>>> http://www.well.com/~jax # working out at the gym, you sweat a lot, don't
>>>> get
>>>> http://www.softwoehr.com # anywhere, and you fall asleep easily afterwards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> crux distro for linux
>> openbsd or netbsd for bsd
>>
>>

My comment on using openbsd or netbsd versus freebsd is purely because
I have not used freebsd myself. Crux and Obsd already has almost
everything I need in a <200MB base system, so I only needed to
download a few package to configure it for specific purpose. I have
always had the impression that freebsd wants me to download >600MB of
data to install. If they created a picobsd distro then I would have
probably prefered using that for some of my stuff.

fernan

-- 
http://www.fernski.com