Re: [dev] dwm development continues NOW

I agree with uriel. In my opinion just seperate the drawing code from
the rest of the code by putting it into its own functions. This should
be sufficient. Please avoid using extra libraries.

2009/6/21 Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>:
> Well, it might work, but lets say that I'm skeptical.
>
> Also I wonder if the gain of moving the handful of lines of code
> involved in drawing dwm's GUI into a library would really be worth it.
>
> Excessive and naive obsession with code reuse is one of the major
> sources of gratuitous complexity in the software industry.
>
> uriel
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:43 PM, hiro<23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> As said, don't miss that all these efforts will be kept at
>> its most minimalist solution.
>>
>> Easily said...
>>
>>> It is the Sensible Solution[tm] to
>>> do it the way he suggests.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> Separating interface and implementation...
>>
>> Not always sane.
>>
>> In this case I agree that it's rather not worth it.
>> If Arg eagerly wants to try it nobody will prevent him in doing so.
>> But if he really managed to bring us out of X doom, I'd be greatly surprised :)
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
http://gnuffy.chaotika.org - Real Community Distro