On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:38:22 -0400
Alex Kilgore <adkilgore_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> hiro wrote:
> > What's wmii-X?
> >
> >
> I think he meant X as in <any version>, and anyways, I think
> that in this case, the whole "dwm v wmii" thing is merely a matter of
> personal preference
> Anyways, I at first thought in a similar fashion about
> stacking as the OP until I got used to it, and eventually I found I
> like the stacking better because it makes long titlebars more
> readable for one, and in terms of workspaces vs tagging, I don;t see
> why having "workspaces" instead of tagging would be advantageous.
> Alex
>
Yeah the stacked layout in wmii is pretty good. I just find it
bothersome that other (unfocused) windows' titles can appear both at
the top and at the bottom of the screen. I would prefer it if they
would all be at the top.
Dieter
Received on Mon Jun 22 2009 - 19:14:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 22 2009 - 19:24:01 UTC