Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)

From: anonymous <>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:00:05 +0300

On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:14:17PM +0200, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> Maybe I miss something, but why not just output results as far as hosts
> are scanned? Output isn't that slow to use threads.

The main idea was abstraction: scanning function just pass scanned host
to next stage instead of calling output function.

It may be good idea to use plan9port, I have just compiled portscan with
9c/9l and it works. What about using libthread instead of pthreads? It
depends on pthreads, right?
Received on Thu Mar 04 2010 - 20:00:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 04 2010 - 20:12:02 UTC