Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)

From: Dmitry Maluka <>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:17:08 +0200

On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:00:05PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:14:17PM +0200, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> > Maybe I miss something, but why not just output results as far as hosts
> > are scanned? Output isn't that slow to use threads.
> The main idea was abstraction: scanning function just pass scanned host
> to next stage instead of calling output function.

What is the profit from this abstraction? You call remove_scanned()
which moves host from host queue to scanned queue; output() takes hosts
from scanned queue and calls hostprint() for them; and you do
synchronization. Why not just call hostprint() at the beginning?
Received on Thu Mar 04 2010 - 21:17:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 04 2010 - 21:36:02 UTC