On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:04:17PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2010, at 11:53, pancake wrote:
>>
>> That's why mmap is for. Using read is just stupid.
>
> I've been told mmap hugely complicates virtual memory systems. Anyone
> want to confirm or deny this?
Yes, it does. Hugely. But, on the other hand, it's the entire
basis of modern malloc implementatons and dynamic linking and
loading.
-- Kris Maglione Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO is the answer. --Eric NaggumReceived on Sat Jun 12 2010 - 11:07:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jun 12 2010 - 11:12:03 UTC