Re: [dev] How about sta.li ?

Cant this be done with a wraper shellscript ? Messing with gnu ld is
like a near death experience.

Using r2libs can also be possible.. But would be more complex than a
few loc shellscript.

That's what libtool does ( between many other silly things) which we
dont need, and certainly i would prefer to be cmpiler agnostic and be
able to use tcc or llvm.

Inthe other side u can do this by specifying --enable-static and --
dudable-shared in any prj using autofools (webkit, X11 ..)

I dont get the point with the 'tee like'

On Jul 31, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Krankkatze,
>
> On 31 July 2010 19:43, Krankkatze <krankkatze_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm very interested in the sta.li project and would like to know if
>> the
>> project is still active or not, and if any help could be brought.
>> Thanks!
>
> It's inactive atm, but I did plenty work in the sta.li area that is
> still unpublished, also because I did some sort of it at work.
> I plan to resolve the issues during the next weeks and will provide an
> update by then.
>
> Help is definitely welcome, particularly in the area of patching ld in
> order to produce static libraries when shared objects are requested in
> a tee-like fashion and to statically link executables when shared
> objects are supplied. I started some ld patches a while ago, but they
> are half way, but I'm happy to provide them on request.
>
> HTH,
> Anselm
>
Received on Sun Aug 01 2010 - 09:30:04 CEST