Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

From: Moritz Wilhelmy <crap_AT_wzff.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 01:50:15 +0200

Excerpts from Jacob Todd's message of Fri Oct 08 01:24:55 +0200 2010:
> Glibc has been like that for a while. Use dietlibc if you want to actually
> link statically.

I heard from different sources that dietlibc sucks and is not very
well-maintained (not sure if those rumours are true though)
Why not uclibc?
Received on Fri Oct 08 2010 - 01:50:15 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 08 2010 - 02:00:04 CEST