Re: [dev] sta.li progress

Excellent! I've been searching for something like this. I'll check it out.

On 13 October 2010 08:29, Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Are those issues already solved by
>
> http://www.metasploit.com/redmine/attachments/433/get_bionic_working.diff
>
> ?
>
> 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.lists_AT_gmail.com>:
>> On 12 October 2010 20:58, Wolf Tivy <wtivy1_AT_my.bcit.ca> wrote:
>>>>I've managed to make it compile a good chunk of the object files,
>>>>but not malloc/free so its somewhat wasted.
>>>
>>> It'll talk eventually, keep up the pressure.
>>>
>>>> When I get a chance to go at it again I believe the android distribution
>>>>has some "clean" kernel headers included. I may try to move those to
>>>>wherever its looking now.
>>>
>>> Yes it does, in fact I think it shouldn't need any system headers at all,
>>> if you point it to the paths in OVERVIEW.TXT. Is there some
>>> "include_path" environment variable you can set, or do we have to hack
>>> the jamfile? Or we could do it your way and move them. Worst case is a new
>>> makefile.
>>
>> there's a variable in the Jamfile INCLUDES_x86, the included header
>> files dont seem to do the trick though. Running into syntax errors.
>>
>>> Surely someone else must have dealt with this. Metasploit has been mentioned
>>> a few times, but I couldn't find any thing more than the blog post
>>> (issue report, whatever) that jens linked. Anyone have a link to more info?
>>>
>>> About uClibc, it's LGPL, so isn't static linking a bit marginal? For
>>> GPL-compatible stuff it's ok, but 9base is incompatible, so it may actually
>>> need to be ported to bionic. Have I got this right?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 13 2010 - 14:32:57 CEST