Re: [dev] [dwm] Fedora package

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:23:56PM +0000, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> > I understand that you software packagers are a special breed, and
> > having even one binary not subject to the rigors of packaging can
> > cause you to lose sleep, but every time you people pull this shit we
> > get an influx of idiots in irc, spamming about how they can patch dwm
> > to act like fluxbox, patch fluxbox to act like dwm, or convert their
> > wm to use some kind of embedded python executable config syntax.
> >
> > For the love of god, can you at least include a notification in the
> > package to the effect that, if someone thinks installing a binary dwm
> > package is a good idea, they can fuck right off and never come to
> > #suckless for "support"?
> > --
> > # Kurt H Maier
> >
>
> Would you feel more comfortable with this?

If this is part of the fedora package I'd be very happy with this. Certainly I
don't intend to include distro specific notes into the mainline man page as
this doesn't sound like the right place.

Cheers,
        Anselm
Received on Tue Oct 19 2010 - 15:14:15 CEST