Re: [dev] which minimal os

From: Andrei <frunzales_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:57:40 -0500

evening,

I'd suggest CRUX, http://crux.nu - It doesn't do any hand holding and it has
a simple package manager similar to BSD ports.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:45 PM, v4hn <me_AT_v4hn.de> wrote:

> evening,
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:35:31PM -0500, Claudiu Bucur wrote:
> > it [gentoo] has been my closest experience to what
> > i imagine "linux from scratch" would be like.
>
> You should try Lunar (lunar-linux.org) or SourceMage (sourcemage.org)
> then.
> Those systems _are_ LFS with a couple of bash scripts to handle
> modules... :)
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:26:21PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> > gentoo is a pile of shit [...]
> > archlinux is just gentoo but less well maintained.
> > debian is a bloated monstrosity
> > ubuntu has all the drawbacks of debian with all the incompetence of arch
> linux.
> > netbsd is run by crackpots.
> > freebsd is decent but not as nice as openbsd
>
> yeah, everything's fubar,
> so I wonder why you even take your time writing such an idiotic mail...
> Go and fix it :P
>
>
> v4hn
>
Received on Sat Feb 12 2011 - 03:57:40 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 12 2011 - 04:00:05 CET