Re: [dev] which minimal os

Wasn't CRUX the biggest influence on the creation of Arch? I could be
wrong. I haven't used it, though. What's the difference between it and
Arch? It's one of the distros one doesn't really hear much about, from
what I've seen.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Andrei <frunzales_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> evening,
> I'd suggest CRUX, http://crux.nu - It doesn't do any hand holding and it has
> a simple package manager similar to BSD ports.
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:45 PM, v4hn <me_AT_v4hn.de> wrote:
>>
>> evening,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:35:31PM -0500, Claudiu Bucur wrote:
>> > it [gentoo] has been my closest experience to what
>> > i imagine "linux from scratch" would be like.
>>
>> You should try Lunar (lunar-linux.org) or SourceMage (sourcemage.org)
>> then.
>> Those systems _are_ LFS with a couple of bash scripts to handle
>> modules... :)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:26:21PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> > gentoo is a pile of shit [...]
>> > archlinux is just gentoo but less well maintained.
>> > debian is a bloated monstrosity
>> > ubuntu has all the drawbacks of debian with all the incompetence of arch
>> > linux.
>> > netbsd is run by crackpots.
>> > freebsd is decent but not as nice as openbsd
>>
>> yeah, everything's fubar,
>> so I wonder why you even take your time writing such an idiotic mail...
>> Go and fix it :P
>>
>>
>> v4hn
>
>
Received on Sat Feb 12 2011 - 04:42:07 CET