[dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

From: Eitan Goldshtrom <thesourceofx_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:27:28 -0400

Hi Everyone,
So I started using wmii a couple months ago. It was the first time I
wasn't using GNOME and it's default stuff and I did so because a friend
recommended wmii to me. So now I want to know what you all think. Why
are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs? Or not? And what are your
opinions of dwm vs wmii?
-Eitan
Received on Wed Apr 20 2011 - 16:27:28 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Nick: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Previous message: emseekay: "Re: [dev] [dwm] Moving windows over status bar is very sluggish"
Next in thread: Nick: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Nick: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Kurt H Maier: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Suraj Kurapati: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Steve Ryan: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Uriel: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Uriel: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 20 2011 - 16:36:02 CEST