On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 03:19:12PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if you intended it
> as an upstream patch, but most people probably won't like it in
> upstream dwm.
I know there are some people using dwm around here,
it was intended for who could find a use case to it.
> Note that drawsquare() is not only used for showing if a
> tag is used by clients but also to indicate floating clients in the
> titlebar so your patch removes that also.
I forgot about that as I don't use floating layout.
> I personally don't like
> hiding the border if there is only one client, it saves only a few
> negligable pixels
Sure, that wasn't meant for the pixels, I just like the border
to be here only when it's useful, one less eye-distraction on the screen.
> and makes the code a bit more complex and
> inconsistent.
I may have added the inconsistency myself because the original patch
didn't cover everything I wanted it to and as I previously said
I have no coding background. ( it just works )
> If you didnt intended it as an upstream patch then all
> is good :)
I'd have to learn coding before requesting upstream inclusion. :)
Thanks for feedback and sharing.
Received on Mon Jul 04 2011 - 21:03:18 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 04 2011 - 21:12:02 CEST