Re: [dev] dwm patch: saveinfo

On 28 August 2011 21:31, Benoit T <benoit.triquet_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:27:57AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>> On 28 August 2011 11:23, Benoit T <benoit.triquet_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > BTW., i am not sure which branch i should follow right now.  Someone
>> > should close or merge the dangling head at rev 1565:ee4aa582320a at
>> > http://hg.suckless.org/dwm
>>
>> That branch is a feature branch for 6.0, whereas trunk is 5.9.1. They
>> aren't ready to be merged. I suspect you want the default, 'default'.
>
> ok i make a note that i don't need to worry and will stay on "default".
>
> considering the justification you give, i completely understand why you
> did not use a named branch, but i understand that the right thing to do
> with mercurial in that case would be to set up a separate clone to
> handle the 6.0 devel branch. is that not feasible in anselm's webserver?

It would be, but that's the approach of people not being used to hg's
branch handling ;)

Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Sun Aug 28 2011 - 23:19:48 CEST