Re: [dev] wmii + ruby 1.9.3 = no power woes!

From: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:57:17 +0800

On 11 Nov 2011 04:30, "Anselm R Garbe" <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8 November 2011 07:28, Suraj N. Kurapati <sunaku_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > And how is "modern" wmii different from its, let's say, "pre-modern"
> > phase? From my view, it still uses the Plan9 protocol and the Plan9
> > approach of exposing a virtual filesystem for operation by the user.
>
> Yes, however wmii is cursed. Its code base has grown by factor 3 or 4
> in terms of SLOC, whereas its functionality has stalled.
>
>

Why is that, and how did that happen?

-jf
Received on Fri Nov 11 2011 - 11:57:17 CET