Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

From: ilf <>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:05:13 +0100

On 02-08 09:39, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> rxvt-unicode uses the wonderful optimization of not really caring
> whether everything gets displayed.

I don't know if every one of those output lines is rendered on screen
once. But it doesn't need to, since I can't read it anyways, no matetr
if it takes 1, 3 or the 28 seconds takes here.

What's more important is that everything is in the scrollback, which
always seems to be the case, even in rxvt.

(Although I consider this bad style. If you really need 10k lines and
want to look at them, that's what less is for.)

So I don't see the problem with rxvt's way of things. Why not do it?

> #define FONT "-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-*-*"

Using my shandard 12 doesn't change the behavior.
It's not the font size, since width is ok, it's just the height is
slightly less than in rxvt and I think dwm status bar, too.

Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
		-- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung

Received on Wed Feb 08 2012 - 16:05:13 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Feb 08 2012 - 16:12:03 CET