Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> writes:
> On 9 February 2012 10:16, Hadrian Węgrzynowski <hadrian_AT_hawski.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:15:52 +0100
>> Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Btw. I would like you to use C and rc, not C and bash or something
>>>similar.
>>
>> There were once discussion about "blessed" rc version, but AFAIR there
>> were no simple conclusion. What version of rc is good enough?
>> What I remember: Byron's version is cursed and p9p version is too big.
>> So which one is good?
>
> Of course
>
> http://tools.suckless.org/9base
This one is even more bloated than the others:
text data bss dec hex filename
77360 632 7496 85488 14df0 /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-static-musl
81682 2088 6344 90114 16002 /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-dyn-glibc
116849 3520 18272 138641 21d91 /opt/plan9/bin/rc-dyn-glibc
154252 4480 20120 178852 2baa4 /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-musl
862556 8176 28824 899556 db9e4 /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-glibc
(Yes, the statically linked musl version is smaller than the dynamically
linked glibc version of the same program.)
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
Received on Fri Feb 10 2012 - 01:58:49 CET