By bloated you mean the binary size is a miniscule; practically
meaningless, amount larger than the others. That hardly counts as bloated.
On Feb 9, 2012 7:59 PM, "Christian Neukirchen" <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com>
wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 9 February 2012 10:16, Hadrian Węgrzynowski <hadrian_AT_hawski.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:15:52 +0100
> >> Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Btw. I would like you to use C and rc, not C and bash or something
> >>>similar.
> >>
> >> There were once discussion about "blessed" rc version, but AFAIR there
> >> were no simple conclusion. What version of rc is good enough?
> >> What I remember: Byron's version is cursed and p9p version is too big.
> >> So which one is good?
> >
> > Of course
> >
> > http://tools.suckless.org/9base
>
> This one is even more bloated than the others:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 77360 632 7496 85488 14df0
> /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-static-musl
> 81682 2088 6344 90114 16002
> /home/chris/src/rc-1.7.1/rc-dyn-glibc
> 116849 3520 18272 138641 21d91 /opt/plan9/bin/rc-dyn-glibc
> 154252 4480 20120 178852 2baa4
> /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-musl
> 862556 8176 28824 899556 db9e4
> /home/chris/src/9base/rc/rc-static-glibc
>
> (Yes, the statically linked musl version is smaller than the dynamically
> linked glibc version of the same program.)
> --
> Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
>
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 10 2012 - 04:03:02 CET