On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Raphael Proust <raphlalou_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jente Hidskes <jthidskes_AT_outlook.com> wrote:
>> You're right - I should not have submitted the patch with a bug that would
>> crash DWM. However, it was only with seven clients or more and as I rarely
>> have more than 3 open at once, for me it wasn't that big of an issue. I have
>> now fixed it, though.
i sometimes switch to tag 0 when i'm looking for a windows that i've
lost in the other tags somewhere. i tend to use Monocle where the
number of terms/windows potentially goes beyond 7 etc... i think if
it crashes dwm it isn't acceptable, i wouldn't want to encounter the
crash anyway...
>
> You can make patches public by cloning the website repo
> (http://git.suckless.org/sites/), adding a page for your patch and pushing
> the changes.
>
and mention its weaknesses :p
Received on Wed Mar 27 2013 - 16:03:28 CET