Re: [dev] [st][patch] not roll our own utf functions

From: Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 18:06:55 +0100

Quoth Christoph Lohmann:
> On Sun, 05 May 2013 16:49:06 +0200 Strake <strake888_AT_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > From c40205fe15f0da048128f8735fd2140605de5e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Strake <strake888_AT_gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 09:35:58 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] not roll our own utf functions
>
> Rejected due to dependency hell.

Hmm, I'm not sure that's the right decision. Maybe include the
appropriate .c & .h file for libutf in the source tree? That's what
I do in a couple of projects. I don't have strong feelings about it,
but libutf is pretty reasonable and I'm not convinced it should be
avoided.
Received on Sun May 05 2013 - 19:06:55 CEST