Re: [dev] [st][patch] not roll our own utf functions

From: Mihail Zenkov <mihail.zenkov_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 09:16:41 +0000

2013/5/5, Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk>:
> Quoth Christoph Lohmann:
>> On Sun, 05 May 2013 16:49:06 +0200 Strake <strake888_AT_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > From c40205fe15f0da048128f8735fd2140605de5e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Strake <strake888_AT_gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 09:35:58 -0500
>> > Subject: [PATCH] not roll our own utf functions
>>
>> Rejected due to dependency hell.
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure that's the right decision. Maybe include the
> appropriate .c & .h file for libutf in the source tree? That's what
> I do in a couple of projects. I don't have strong feelings about it,
> but libutf is pretty reasonable and I'm not convinced it should be
> avoided.

I also like and Christoph dislike dependency, but I agree with your proposition.
Received on Mon May 06 2013 - 11:16:41 CEST