[libutf] Re: [dev] [st][patch] not roll our own utf functions
On 05/05/2013 01:06 PM, Nick wrote:
> Hmm, I'm not sure that's the right decision. Maybe include the
> appropriate .c & .h file for libutf in the source tree? That's what
> I do in a couple of projects. I don't have strong feelings about it,
> but libutf is pretty reasonable and I'm not convinced it should be
> avoided.
I also have to wonder what's the point of libutf at all if it's not
going to be used as the UTF-8 library for suckless projects.
Received on Sun May 05 2013 - 19:36:52 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun May 05 2013 - 19:48:04 CEST