Re: [dev] [sbase / 9base] Still working on it?

From: Carlos Torres <>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 14:14:14 -0400

I believe it already has what you need to replace coreutils/busybox.
though its not just a matter or swapping stuff. you'ld have to port
all the shell scripts that depend on gnuish stuff. i.e. anything that
uses the auto* stuff doesn't work with 9base awk and ls... but do you
really need stuff that uses auto* cruft?


On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Hugues <> wrote:
> Le 27-05-2013 02:48, Carlos Torres a écrit :
>> sbase and 9base are still used. i use 9base every day :).
> Ah, nice. It's awesome.
>> not much work goes into these since they don't
>> aspire to having all the gnu options... what more do you need?
> Actually, I'm trying to find a coreutils/busybox alternative which suck
> less, for a distro project.
> That's why, I asked this question. I was wondering if it was abandoned/dead
> or not.
> About features, I don't think I need something new.
> Regards
> --
> H MoV.
Received on Mon May 27 2013 - 20:14:14 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon May 27 2013 - 20:24:05 CEST